At the heart of education is the teacher-student relationship. My philosophy of teaching begins there. Building a relationship with a student allows them to trust you and ultimately leads them to better understand the world around them. I want students to know I will be open and honest with them. I will give them tools to learn new subjects in class and continue learning long after our time together. These tools are centered around a culture of inquiry by encouraging students to ask tough questions (even ones I cannot quickly answer) and showing them how to use inquiry to solve new and more significant problems themselves. In my classes, students will be presented with examples of inquiry to follow and countless opportunities to create their methods of inquiry.
I believe that students should be met where they are developmentally by using effective evidence-based teaching methods. In addition, one should remember that students are individuals, not a stereotype or a monolith. They should be observed and collaborated with to see what best works for their learning, including students with disabilities.
To achieve these primary goals, the classroom needs to be a safe, inclusive, and welcoming space, and the teacher needs to maintain the elements that make the classroom safe for all students. This can be done through various means; modeling and encouraging respect for all students, actively stopping disrespect or micro-aggressions, and working to improve relationships with all students and among students. It requires going beyond the old "color-blind" model to one that is knowledgeable of issues my students face beyond academics to their social and cultural challenges and understanding the context of these issues to offer empathy and compassion when needed. Teaching science does not mean you turn your heart off.
Science education should be rigorous and meet the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS). Its three-dimensional model (Practices / Core Ideas / Crosscutting Concepts) provides an excellent evidence-based framework for learning, understanding, and teaching science in K-12 schools. Its wide acceptance across the country gives it an authority that makes it more resistant to less biased criticism while providing a method for revision as science continues to develop.
At the same time, science education must be relevant, engaging, and at times fun for students. Teaching subjects with such a high level of abstraction requires taking the time to connect the material to students’ day-to-day lives as much as possible to aid in their understanding. The use of discrepants to keep things exciting and fun while helping them question their prior knowledge on the way to constructing new knowledge will be a frequently used technique for my classes as well.
As a science teacher, I am cognizant of the fact that more experience will continue to shape my philosophy, but I believe the core elements (all students deserve equal respect regardless of race / class / age / gender / disability / etc. meet them where they’re at, and give them the best evidence-based teaching possible.) will stay the same much like the core tenets of science have stayed the same.